—

M2.7 → M3 — a huge step. From flop into top 3. Very similar in style to Opus

Nice, big progress for the model. Made very fast. * Product by Meta, recognized as extremist and banned in Russia.

Twice as expensive as Opus 4.7 at Kilo. Checks itself a lot. The result is slightly better

Typical Opus 4.7. Clean in places, interesting, from afar it's super-duper

Keeps the Opus 4.7 style, simplifies the implementation

Opus in its style, especially from afar, but ate more than a full 5-hour quota

Quick. Expensive. Awesome.

Not bad; after this screen Openrouter banned American SOTA models

Opus with Frontend Design skill — desktop only in local asset set

Burns more; not necessarily better than 4.7. Three screens used half of the already-doubled 5h pro quota.

Typical Anthropic and Opus

Typical Opus, very similar to previous generations. But the color is unusual — where’s the beige, Opus? :–)

A surprisingly good result for Auto mode. The style choice is like from Opus

Slow, partly because the model did not read the images itself and instead reached for the available zai MCP server to analyse them. That would make sense for regular DeepSeek, but this one has vision. Lots of re-checking, as if I had typed /goal make the most fantastic design ever.

Noticeably better than Gemini 3.1 Pro. The only one who decided to do a dark mode.

Unlike Cursor, Opencode got something out of GLM — OK for its price

Clearly much better than GLM 5.2, which couldn't even use tools properly for me (will rerun it). Spent the first 10 minutes studying images via zai MCP; the model isn't multimodal.

Surprisingly, I like this variant even more than GPT 5.5

The agent is different, the model is recognizable. Slightly better than in Codex

Really strong copywriting (hadn't paid attention to it before). Design is average, not SOTA.

Very fast, cheap (50% discount for now), overall fine for the money. Promo is primitive

Fast, overall decent, very distinctive. Pros: didn't turn the desktop UI into a promo site. Cons: still not quite great — could have put images somewhere

In general looks like a simplified Opus 4.7, much closer to Sonnet in overall layout

In general Qwen did decently. A bit dim, but pretty solid. 1/30 of Opus's price

Substantially closer to the Chinese models and the simpler ones. Neat, but completely neutral, completely simplified

Catastrophically bad, worse than in Paper

Very primitive, but also very cheap. Doesn't match the claimed level

Comparable in cost to Composer 2, quality has grown, but still very not great

Seems inexpensive, but no point in using it, neuro-slop

Default and Default Thinking seem like different models; reasoning is even worse

Result comparable to Gemini in Antigravity. Very bad for a model of this level

Very bad at using tools, monstrous integration into the tool

In general worse than in Paper. GLM didn't master a correct DOM

Much weaker than full GLM 5.3 Max: vision is there, but layout bugs (servings overlap, clipping) were not fixed. ~9.7M tokens in 21 min.

In Figma slightly better than in Paper. Lays things out monstrously simply

Very cheap compared to opus, the result is accordingly. The worst result among SOTA models

Mixed impressions. Mobile is generally fine. Promo is worse

Unlike Cursor, Opencode couldn't handle the model at all

Fast, weak, expensive for this quality

Same prompt with Google's design skill; compare with OpenCode Grok Build 0.1 without a skill

The trendiest open-source model on Openrouter. Very so-so

Mobile is better than the rest. Everything was duplicated, then erased via screenshots — 40+ minutes

—

Included Cursor model; very cheap in subscription terms, weak on design

Incredibly fast, incredibly cheap, the quality is accordingly

Weak, nothing outstanding

Expensive for its result, no improvement over 3.6 Max. Very bad at using tools

DeepSeek is very cheap, but managed only once. Mobile is watchable

DeepSeek is very cheap, but managed only once. Mobile is watchable

GLM in Cursor for some reason couldn't cope with the tools

Didn't even cope with the tools. There's not a single reason to use it

Didn't cope with the tools

Couldn't do anything